Queensland Election Results - Another Nail In The Rent Cap Coffin

November 6, 2024 Edward Dever

The ousting of the Miles ALP government in Qld at the recent State election makes the prospect of residential property rent freezes and caps in Qld more remote.

In the lead up to the State election, Ch 9 News reported that the now former Qld Government was considering ACT style inflation-linked rent controls. Former Premier Miles said he would have more to say on the issue as the election campaign continued. Nothing seemed to come of this.

At the first Leaders’ debate, the LNP ruled out introducing rent caps. The ALP took a similar stance, making former Premier Miles’ other comments somewhat confusing.

Previously, in June 2024, the Qld Department of Housing, Local Government, Planning and Public Works stated that it believed forms of rent control are generally ineffective.

During the 57th Qld Parliament, The Greens twice attempted to introduce rent control legislation, in each case the relevant Committee recommended against its introduction and the Bills were scrapped.

The Greens were apparently initially targeting 10 seats during the State election campaign . The results leave them with one, and possibly, two seats. One of the seats in doubt is South Brisbane held by Greens MP Amy MacMahon. Counting is still underway. Ms MacMahon introduced the two previous Rent Cap Bills and the loss of South Brisbane to the ALP would remove The Greens’ most outspoken rent cap spokesperson in Qld Parliament.

Federally, even The Greens housing spokesman Max Chandler-Mather is watering down their demands and is no longer insisting on a national rent freeze:

“We don’t need a freeze on rent increases like we’ve said … we could negotiate on some sort of cap to limit the amount rents go up,” he said.

In the lead up to the 2025 Federal election, it is likely that The Greens will continue to campaign on rent caps. Any rent control legislation would, however, need to be passed by the Qld Parliament and the election of the LNP in Qld indicates that passing any such legislation would be a tough sell.

Report No. 7, 57th Parliament, Housing, Big Build and Manufacturing Committee, May 2024

November 2024

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.

Gold Coast City Council Taxes Views

August 4, 2024 Edward Dever

In a move reminiscent of the window tax applied in England between 1696 and 1851 (as well as similar taxes in France and Scotland), Gold Coast City Council has introduced higher rates charges for owner occupied apartments on higher floors.

Dubbed the 'view tax', owner occupied apartments will be levied higher rates depending on the floor level.

Apartments above the 5th floor will be subject to a rates surcharge starting at 10-20% between floors 5-10 up to 40-50% for those above the 40th floor.

Council justifies the increased charges on the basis of charging owners fairly based on the effect that unit size and floor level has on a property’s value.

In simple terms, Council is implementing a wealth tax - taxing those residents it deems able to afford higher rates. This is similar to the window tax. It was designed to reflect a property owner's wealth as glass was apparently considered a luxury. It led to owners bricking up their windows to minimise the tax. Of course, as it is based on the floor level and not the view, Gold Coast residents will find it harder to avoid the rate increase.

Gold Coast high-rise apartment owners hit with 'view tax' as council raises rates

August 2024

United States Plans Nationwide Rent Controls - With A Catch

July 17, 2024 Edward Dever

US President Joe Biden has announced a plan ahead of the 2024 US Election to cap rent increases across the nation at five per cent per annum.

On 16 July 2024, the Biden-Harris Administration called on Congress to pass legislation giving corporate landlords a choice to either cap rent increases on existing units at five per cent or risk losing current valuable federal tax breaks.

The proposal would apply during 2024 and the following two years but would only apply to corporate landlords who own at least 50 units of housing stock. Over 20 million units of rental housing would be affected by the proposal. An exception would apply to new construction and substantial renovation or rehabilitation.

Failure to comply would see these landlords unable to take advantage of faster depreciation write-offs available to owners of rental housing.

It seems unlikely Congress will get on board with the rent control proposal, particularly in the run up to the 2024 Election in November. (As an aside, former President Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner's somewhat controversial family group controls 20,000 multi-family apartments and would be caught by President Biden's proposal.)

The Australian Greens will no doubt pick up on this proposal. Their plans to date have not included a minimum rental housing ownership threshold before their controls kick in. Their plan also has no sunset date - two years of rent freezes followed by a maximum two per cent increase every two years thereafter. The Federal government has repeatedly distanced itself from the Greens proposal. The Queensland government has also shut the door on rent controls - for now.

President Biden Announces Major New Actions to Lower Housing Costs by Limiting Rent Increases and Building More Homes

July 2024

Queensland Government Shuts The Door On Rent Controls - For Now

May 20, 2024 Edward Dever

On 10 May 2024, the Housing, Big Build and Manufacturing Committee released its report on the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024.

One of the more interesting matters in the Report is a statement that the Department of Housing, Local Government, Planning and Public Works believes forms of rent control are generally ineffective.

The Report (on page 20) states:

"the department noted that economic research has identified that rent price controls, such as restricting or limiting the amount rent can be increased by, are generally ineffective at improving rental affordability and can have other negative effects, such as reducing the quality of rental stock and reducing renter mobility. They noted that the best way to address rental affordability is by increasing housing supply."

The Greens continue to press the Federal Government to introduce a form of rent freeze followed by rent caps.

As recent as 16 May, Greens MP Max Chandler-Mather, commenting on Twitter/X about PM Albanese's move to evict his tenant ahead of a likely property sale, stated that "[i]f the Prime Minister wanted to treat renters fairly, he would coordinate a freeze and cap on rent increases". The Greens are unlikely to drop rent controls as part of their platform ahead of the next Federal election.

The Committee concluded that the Government's Bill should be passed although it noted a number of areas where the Department needed to do more homework.

These include:

- the time frame for the retention of tenant records

- wider consultation on a portable bond scheme

- the documentation needed for utility bills payable by tenants

- the prohibition of accepting more than four weeks rent in advance, and

- disclosure in leases of the last rent increase as it applies to newly purchased properties.

The Bill, when enacted, will restrict residential property rent increases to once every 12 months and apply the restriction to the property rather than the lease.

It will also legislate that a landlord cannot act unreasonably in refusing a tenant’s request to attach a fixture or make structural changes to the premises either relating to safety, security and accessibility, or for personalisation purposes. Tenants may seek recourse through QCAT if denied approval. This also applies to modifications related to strata common property with strict timeframes for strata approval.

Over time, we will see if some of these provisions act as a further disincentive to residential rental property investment in Queensland.

UPDATE - The Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 was passed by Parliament on 23 May 2024.

Report No. 7, 57th Parliament Housing, Big Build and Manufacturing Committee May 2024

May 2024

Queensland Government Shelves Plans To Amend Property Valuation Laws

May 9, 2024 Edward Dever

Last week, the Queensland Government shelved proposed land valuation amendments under the Land Valuation Amendment Bill 2023.

Resources Minister Scott Stewart pulled the proposed amendments for further consultation and revision, a process which should push out any progress beyond the October 2024 State election. It is not clear whether a future LNP Government (if elected) will proceed with the amendments.

Much of the stakeholder feedback on the Bill centred on the introduction of binding Valuer-General guidelines for valuations with concern raised that there would be no prior consultation and future guidelines could enhance property values resulting in higher land taxes and Council rates.

Also of concern was the proposal to remove the $750,000 threshold which requires a person objecting to a valuation to advise the Valuer-General of the valuation sought. This would require all landowners to state the valuation sought in their objection and would increase the costs of lodging an objection.

Changes to the definition of “unencumbered” were also considered controversial, resulting in uncertainty over how land is to be valued.

Qld land valuation laws shelved by government following input from property industry

May 2024

Further Proposed Changes to Queensland Residential Tenancy Legislation

April 2, 2024 Edward Dever

On 21 March 2024, the Queensland Government introduced the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024.

The Bill’s purpose is to further strengthen tenants’ rights and stabilise rents in the private rental market.

The proposed amendments include:

- adopting a standard rental application form (as yet only partially specified) which limits the information a tenant need provide.

- applying the 12 month rent increase restriction to the property rather than the lease, regardless of a change in property ownership. Lease breaks may lead to rent increases during future lease terms rather than at the commencement of the lease term.

- requiring leases to state the date of last rent increase, with tenants permitted to request evidence of such increase. Existing leases are exempt.

- prohibiting rent bidding, including accepting an unsolicited offer higher than advertised.

- capping reletting costs in the event of a lease break.

- legislating that a landlord cannot act unreasonably in refusing a tenant’s request to attach a fixture or make structural changes to the premises relating to safety, security and accessibility. Tenants may seek recourse through QCAT if denied approval.

- capping rent in advance payments to a maximum of 4 weeks rent - the amendment changes the prohibition on requiring an advance payment to accepting an advance payment. This may necessitate refunds in certain circumstances to prevent breaches although perhaps less problematic with periodic payment arrangements.

- adding new time limits for the provision of water service charges payable by a tenant.

One of the Bill’s stated aims is to improve the rental experience for Queensland renters and property owners. Some landlords may contend that the seemingly endless legislative amendments are having the opposite effect. Agents are also facing more compliance tasks and complicated leasing arrangements.

The deadline for submissions on the Bill is 10 April 2024.

RTA - Have your say on new rental law reforms

April 2024

The Lithium-ion Battery Condundrum Facing Landlords

January 12, 2024 Edward Dever

The increased use of lithium-ion powered devices such as e-scooters presents a conundrum for landlords and strata committees.

A rise in the number of lithium-ion linked fires in homes is occurring amid a vacuum of government standards for dealing with these risks.

"Research by the organisation EV Fire Safe found that if a battery goes into thermal runaway inside a home, there is a 64% chance of being injured and requiring hospitalisation, and a 7.8% chance of death."

While there are some fire extinguishers available to suppress lithium-ion fires, in the absence of government standards, some fire safety consultants are currently reluctant to make specific recommendations in relation to lithium-ion fires.

In the linked article, Professor Christensen advises that lithium-ion devices should only be charged outside.

The Owners Corporation Network, an independent body representing apartment owners, has now made a similar recommendation.

But how practical is this suggestion in the context of apartment living? And are landlords and strata committees really aware of the number of devices currently used in their properties? (OCN has suggested that strata management maintain e-scooter and e-bike registers.)

Given the number of devices in properties across Australia, the risk seems relatively small at present but experts warn the risk increases where people use cheaper mismatched chargers or engage in unsafe charging practices.

Fire blankets commonly available are inadequate for dealing with lithium-ion related fires. Fire blankets capable of suppressing lithium-ion fires are coming to market but are generally not of an appropriate size or realistically priced for home use. Over time, this should change.

The insurance sector appears silent on the issue. But there is a risk of fires from lithium-ion batteries forming an exclusion from future policy coverage or at least a reluctance on the part of insurance companies to honour coverage if (as yet undefined) appropriate charging practices are not followed.

In the meantime, landlords and strata committees await the development of appropriate government standards for charging lithium-ion devices and dealing with related fires.

The ‘ticking time bombs’ inside Aussie homes sparking a rising number of fires

Owners Corporation Network proposes new e-bike, e-scooter rules

January 2024

Greens Target Brisbane LGA Rent Freeze

November 8, 2023 Edward Dever

To date, The Greens have tried and failed twice to implement a rent freeze in Queensland and once at the Federal level. In this latest attempt, 2024 Greens Lord Mayoral candidate Jonathan Sriranganathan plans to implement a two-year rent freeze on residential properties in the Brisbane local government area, backdated to January 2023. This assumes The Greens control Brisbane City Council after the election in March 2024.

To implement their plan, The Greens propose to control rents via penalty rates applied to any investor who raises rents above January 2023 levels. Rental properties where rent has increased would be "reclassified into the new ‘Uncapped rental home’ rating category."

The penalty is an additional 650% of the current rates bill so the total rates bill would be 750% higher following The Greens' market intervention. Using The Greens' example of a unit rented for $750 per week with a rates bill of $1,500 per year, any rent increase would result in an extra rates bill of $9,750, with a total rates bill of $11,250.

Any landlord who has increased rent with the tenant's agreement between January 2023 and the Council election in March 2024 would be penalised, whether that rent increase was less than 1% or 30%.

The Greens' plan is to apply the rent freeze to the property rather than the tenancy and to use median suburb rents for any new build or substantial renovation.

Penalty rates are claimed to be revenue neutral as the Greens contend that landlords will not put up rents. However this ignores the fact that many landlords will have raised rents over the 15 month period prior to the 2024 Council election.

Landlords in Brisbane (and elsewhere in Queensland) are currently subject to an effective 12 month rent freeze following the State Government's amendments to the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act preventing landlords from increasing the rent within a 12 month period.

Rent controls in other jurisdictions (such as Ireland and San Francisco) have resulted in reduced residential rental supply as landlords change use to avoid the controls or sell out of the market. It also acts as a disincentive for new investment builds. (Note that The Greens plan to increase rates for Airbnb-style properties by 1,000%.)

Any developer who views The Greens as potentially controlling Brisbane City Council post-March 2024 is likely to look more favourable at projects outside the Brisbane LGA (e.g. Redcliffe, Logan, Ipswich) rather than risk the imposition of a two-year rent freeze on their projects.

Similar to the Queensland government's proposed (then scrapped) land tax changes, the prospect of a rent freeze throughout Brisbane is likely to alter investors' decisions well ahead of any actual imposition of a freeze.

Lord Mayoral candidate Jonathan Sriranganathan proposes two-year rent freeze in Brisbane

Freeze Rents in Brisbane: No more unlimited rent increases

November 2023

Ineffective Strata Minority Cram Down Rule Creates Problems

October 4, 2023 Edward Dever

The Queensland Government may wish to cast an eye towards NSW before finalising amendments to its strata legislation which will permit 75% of owners to terminate uneconomic community title schemes.

On 24 August 2023, the Body Corporate and Community Management and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 was introduced into the Queensland Parliament. The Bill was referred to the Legal Affairs and Safety Committee for detailed consideration. The closing date for written submissions was a mere nine days later on 2 September. The Qld Law Society raised concerns in their submission regarding the short timeframe.

Under the proposed Queensland amendments, minority unit owners may be forced to sell their units in circumstances where there are economic reasons for terminating the scheme supported by 75% of the scheme owners.

This reform was described as "deliver[ing] a key action of the 2022 Queensland Housing Summit by reforming the BCCM Act to allow for termination of uneconomic community titles schemes to facilitate renewal and redevelopment."

The Bill's Explanatory Notes specifically refer to "having regard to the New South Wales approach."

The only problem is that terminating schemes in NSW has not been that simple with only a handful of schemes apparently managing to negotiate a sale. Developers are now saying they "aren't interested in buying older buildings unless there’s 100 per cent agreement from owners to sell."

Designed to protect the elderly owner from unscrupulous developers, at least in one instance in NSW, the reverse seems to have occurred - protecting a rival developer from the building's elderly owners. The NSW amendments have not prevented strategic blocking attempts by competing developers.

The NSW Minister for Better Regulation and Fair Trading has vowed to fix the glitches. “The NSW government is committed to updating and reforming this system, including fixing the loopholes that have made it out of date."

Perhaps the Queensland Government will revisit its amendments before passing a Bill with baked-in glitches, at least based on the NSW experience.

The Legal Affairs and Safety Committee is due to hand down its Report on 6 October.

This law was meant to solve Sydney’s housing crisis. It’s left owners devastated

Legal Affairs And Safety Committee - Body Corporate and Community Management and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2023

October 2023

Shadowy Chinese Firms That Own Chunks Of Cambodia

October 1, 2023 Edward Dever

Interesting BBC piece on exploitation of Cambodia's resources. The only thing that seems to have changed over the past 30 years is the nationality of those doing the exploiting.

In the mid to late 1990s, French and Malaysian investors attempted, often successfully, to take advantage of Cambodian government officials.

Almost 30 years later, it is Chinese investors although they now deal with a far more sophisticated government apparatus as indicated by the increasing wealth disparity between Cambodian government and business figures and the rest of the population.

Looking back at the land speculation deals dressed up as rice farming projects and the favourable airport concession arrangements, one ultimately unsuccessful deal stands out.

In late 1996 and early 1997, there was a grand plan to erect a sound and light show at Angkor Wat. This proposal would have seen management of the temple complex outsourced to a Malaysian conglomerate which would have had full authority over the area. Cambodians were to be excluded from their own temple other than on particular religious holidays. The Malaysian group was to have total control over the content of the sound and light show and would be entitled to make modifications to the temple complex as they erected their equipment and built fencing.

Equally concerning was the plan to build hotels right up to the front of Angkor Wat, a detrimental step that was unlikely to have ever been reversed.

The contract was a particularly one-sided affair with the Cambodians effectively ceding sovereignty over Angkor to a foreign corporation.

The deal reached an impasse and, in the second half of 1997, an economic tsunami hit Asia. A number of Asian economies fell like dominoes commencing with Thailand. Malaysia enacted currency and capital controls, effectively walling itself off from the rest of Asia.

The economic crisis severely impacted the Malaysian conglomerate and it went home to try to revive its finances. Its grand plans for Angkor Wat came to nothing. The economic crisis had saved what would arguably have been Angkor Wat's destruction.

Today, as tourists return post-Covid to gaze at the wonder of Angkor Wat, they should say a quick thank you to one of the silver linings of the Asian Economic Crisis.

The shadowy Chinese firms that own chunks of Cambodia

October 2023