Thai-based Airlines Battle Covid Restrictions

Flying under the radar is the recent creditor approval of the rehabilitation plan for Nok Air. The plan goes before the Central Bankruptcy Court on 26 August 2021 for approval.

The prospects for airlines such as Nok Air and Thai Airways seem grim at present given the surge in Covid-19 cases throughout Thailand.

In July, the Civil Aviation Authority banned all flights to and from provinces declared Covid-19 hotspots (dark red zones) forcing all airlines to halt domestic operations. Nok Air shifted its temporary base to U-tapao airport near Rayong in an effort to keep some flights operational and continue to service Phuket which has reopened to vaccinated foreign tourists under a Sandbox model, as well as limited other flights.

The Government was forced to make exceptions to the grounding of flights to support the viability of the Sandbox programs like Phuket and Koh Samui.

Reported Covid-19 cases in Thailand currently exceed 20,000 per day (out of an estimated population of 70 million). The actual case numbers are likely to be significantly higher. The Government's admission that cases are likely to double in the next month indicates a failure of current restrictions to contain the spread of the Delta variant. The Government's approach to dealing with the Delta variant has been 'too little too late' although the rollout of vaccinations continues.

After much success battling Covid-19 in 2020, several policy failures have helped the spread of Covid-19 throughout Thailand, including the failure to cancel the Songkran New Year holidays in April and shifting Covid-19 positive cases back to their home provinces to alleviate the strain on Bangkok's medical resources.

The failure to enforce a proper lockdown is linked to business pressures and an inability to offer anything more than meagre Government financial support to individuals affected by a lockdown. Lockdowns also make social distancing more difficult for multi-generational households.

With a significant portion of the country's annual GDP linked to foreign tourism, the battle ahead for Thai-based airlines and other tourism related business is a mammoth one. The Government's plans to completely open up the country to vaccinated foreign tourists by mid-October (the 120 day plan) seem in tatters with the airlines remaining on life support.

Nok Airlines PCL - Creditors’ Meeting Resolution

CAAT allows special Sandbox charter flights to Bangkok

Country to reopen 'in 120 days'


August 2021

© PELEN 2021

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.

Creditors Approve THAI's Rehabilitation Plan

On 19 May 2021, Thai Airways creditors approved the rehabilitation plan at an adjourned online creditors meeting.

According to THAI's SET Notice, creditors holding over 91% of debt attending the meeting and voting approved the plan, including three amendments proposed by the planner, Bangkok Bank and the Federation of Savings and Credit Cooperatives of Thailand Limited

On 28 May, the Central Bankruptcy Court set a hearing date on 15 June to consider the plan and two objections raised by creditors.

The plan, as approved by creditors, appears to be more of a standstill arrangement with creditors deferring repayment in the hope that THAI's business can be revived and no hard decisions implemented to repair the balance sheet.

THAI faces the prospect of delisting from the SET if it is unable to fix its balance sheet insolvency within three years.

It is also unclear how THAI will fund the cash required to effectively restart the business.

Thai Airways says court hearing on business restructuring moved to mid-June

May 2021

© PELEN 2021

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.

Government Squabbles Ahead of THAI Creditor Vote

Concerns that Thai Airways is just a toy for members of the Thai Government to argue over are reinforced by claims that the Finance Ministry will not participate in any recapitalisation under its rehabilitation plan.

The current argument centres around whether THAI should once again become a state enterprise with the Ministry of Finance increasing its shareholding above 50%.

The reduction below 50% prior to THAI entering rehabilitation proceedings was largely an exercise in shuffling the excess shareholding to satellite Government-linked funds.

The Finance Minister appears to be in support of his Ministry regaining majority control of THAI. The head of the State Enterprise Policy Office (SEPO) is taking the contrary view, arguing that THAI is effectively a money pit and pouring more funds into it cannot be justified to taxpayers.

THAI's plan was scheduled to be voted on by creditors at a meeting on 12 May. Creditors seemed likely to support it given the prospects for THAI if the plan is rejected. However, the vote has now been delayed until 19 May.

Govt 'won't back' billion-baht THAI cash injection

May 2021

© PELEN 2021

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.

Thai Airways - Negative Equity Until 2030

Thai Airways is in the midst of its rehabilitation plan with a creditors' vote on the plan scheduled for 12 May 2021.

THAI's balance sheet insolvency has forced it to make a further disclosure to the Stock Exchange of Thailand as it faces delisting.

In their SET notice on 26 March 2021, THAI indicates that it will remain balance sheet insolvent until 2030. Given that THAI has a three year period to remedy its negative equity position, it admits that the Company may be delisted in due course from the SET.

THAI also gives further insight into its rehabilitation plan, disclosing that it expects a capital increase and creditors will have the option of a debt to equity swap.

It is not clear whether the Thai Government will participate in any capital increase or debt to equity conversion in order to maintain its shareholding in THAI,

Also unclear is whether creditors will accept equity in what may become a non-listed entity.

Meanwhile THAI is disputing around half of its liabilities by claiming that these amounts relate to future expenses and were incurred after the airline entered rehabilitation proceedings.

THAI is disputing around 192 billion baht (USD 6.3 billion) claimed by 48 lessors including BOC Aviation Ltd and SMBC Aviation Capital Ltd, and another 33 billion baht (USD 1.1 billion) that Rolls-Royce says it is owed for maintenance services.

The Thai Bankruptcy Act provides for disputed claims to be resolved by the Official Receiver with a right of appeal to the Bankruptcy Court for any aggrieved party.

THAI - SET Notice - 26 March 2021

Thai Airways disputes $7.4bn of aircraft lessor claims

March 2021

© PELEN 2021

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.

Is The Thai Airways Rehabilitation Plan A Missed Opportunity?

Media reports indicate that THAI's plan submitted on 2 March 2021 to the Bankruptcy Court in Bangkok does not deal with its massive debt burden. The plan apparently contemplates increasing THAI's debts.

THAI has around THB 410 billion (USD 13.5b) in debt.

It needs to raise around THB 50 billion (USD 1.65b) over the next two years.

This may be achieved through “borrowing, investment or debt to equity conversion” according to THAI. (Any debt/equity conversion would not raise new funds.)

The plan does not require haircuts or debt reductions, apparently out of fear that creditors may not approve the plan. Instead, THAI has asked for a three-year debt moratorium after which the debt will be repaid.

THAI's plan is to create a three year debt time out during which it will attempt to turn around the airline. It plans to achieve this via four steps including making it the airline of choice, expanding services, upgrading digital capabilities and improving operational and cost efficiencies.

The lack of balance sheet reform under the plan will remain an IED with a three year fuse. Worse, it looks like a missed opportunity.

There are two main reasons for using court-sanctioned rehabilitation proceedings in Thailand:

1. To protect a company from creditors while it restructures.

2. To implement balance sheet reform using the Bankruptcy Act's plan voting procedures to cram down creditors.

No doubt there are political issues at work but not using the Act's provisions to implement balance sheet reform does seem like a missed opportunity.

THAI's financial woes preceded Covid-19 and it seems unlikely that THAI will have such a change in its fortunes that, in three years, its debt burden becomes sustainable.

THAI has long been burdened by its vast array of aircraft and engine types so plans to reduce its types of aircraft from twelve to five and types of aircraft engines from nine to four are a step in the right direction.

THAI's creditors will meet on 12 May 2021 to vote on the plan.

Thai Airways seeks to raise B50bn

THAI - SET Notice Re Plan

March 2021

© PELEN 2021

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.

When Reverse Ghost Employees Emerge On A Restructuring

Reports have emerged that Thai Airways has allegedly suffered fraud by employees claiming funeral benefit payouts for themselves while continuing to work for the company.

Since 2013, this alleged fraud is estimated to have cost THAI around USD 500,000.

A number of years ago, I was involved in a restructuring which was almost derailed at the 11th hour when it became apparent that a relative of senior management was still drawing a salary from the company five years after their death.

It is very odd that THAI's Human Resources Department does not cross check its payroll against employees who have "died" with resulting payouts by the Savings Cooperative for Employees of Thai Airways.

It is worth remembering that, apparently, THAI could not even provide a single comprehensive list of its frequent flyer program members as it entered formal rehabilitation proceedings.

Thai Airways employees accused of faking death to claim funeral payout

February 2021

© PELEN 2021

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.

Thai Airways - Final Deadline For Rehabilitation Plan

Thai Airways has secured a second and final extension for submission of its rehabilitation plan to the Central Bankruptcy Court. The new deadline is 2 March 2021. (THAI - final deadline)

Work on the rehabilitation plan has not prevented THAI selling some non-core assets. THAI has announced that it has completed the sale of a 15.5% stake in Bangkok Aviation Fuel Services (BAFS) to Ratch Group for Bt 2.7 billion (US$90 million). THAI retains at 7.06% stake in BAFS.

The Central Bankruptcy Court approved the sale on 3 December 2020 with completion on 19 January 2021. BAFS is no longer an affiliate of THAI. (THAI sells BAFS)

Ratch Group is 45% owned by EGAT, the Thai government electricity generating authority, so the sale is somewhat of a shuffle amongst government related entities.

The treatment of creditors under the draft rehabilitation plan remains unclear.

January 2021

© PELEN 2021

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.

Nok Air Enters Rehabilitation Proceedings

Airlines are flavour of the month at Thailand's Central Bankruptcy Court.

The Court has now approved the rehabilitation petition of Nok Airlines PCL, the budget airline part owned by THAI. This follows THAI's entry into rehabilitation proceedings earlier this year.

On 4 November 2020, the Court approved the appointment of Grant Thornton Specialist Advisory Services, Nok Air CEO Wutthiphum Jurangkool and three other board members to prepare the rehabilitation plan.

Creditors may file claims for repayment of their debts within one month of the Planner's appointment being published in the Government Gazette.


Nok Air gets green light to restructure debt

November 2020

© PELEN 2020

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.

When Equity Ranks Ahead of Debt

One of the more interesting aspects of Thai Airways rehabilitation will be the issue of debt to equity conversions.  

THAI's debt load is not sustainable.  It was not profitable before Covid-19 hit and any restructuring will necessarily involve dealing with the debt burden.

In many of the larger past restructurings in Thailand, an informal rule applied - equity ranks somewhere above unsecured debt and often above secured debt. While contrary to Thai law, it is a principle adopted by numerous significant family-owned businesses.

In one meeting, a business owner tossed the keys to his steel mill across the table towards creditors seeking debt to equity conversions, simply saying much to their horror: "Ok, you run it then." They were probably the keys to one of his cars but the point was made.

THAI is controlled by the Thai Government. While the Finance Ministry recently reduced its stake so THAI was no longer a state enterprise, the shares were shuffled sideways to a government-related fund.

It is unlikely the Finance Ministry will agree to dilute its stake in THAI as part of the rehabilitation plan. THAI as a national airline will be seen as an important part of Thailand's image with the Government in firm control for better or worse.

October 2020

© PELEN 2020

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.

Nok Air Follows THAI Into Formal Rehabilitation Proceedings

Thai-based airline, Nok Air, has announced it will follow Thai Airways International into formal rehabilitation proceedings.

Nok Air is part owned by THAI (around 13%) and has been unable to fly its 18 international routes due to Covid19 and its domestic routes in 23 provinces are running at around 30% of its normal schedule.

Nok Air claims that only 200 customers are still awaiting refunds.


"Nok Air insisted on Thursday its business would be able to return to solvency despite the airline following Thai Airways' lead and filing a business rehabilitation request with the Central Bankruptcy court."

Nok Air will be just fine, insists CEO

July 2020

© PELEN 2020

The content of this publication is intended to provide a general overview on matters which may be of interest. It is not intended to be comprehensive. It does not constitute advice in relation to particular circumstances nor does it constitute the provision of legal services, legal advice or financial product advice.